In 2015, Brock Turner, a Stanford College pupil, was convicted of sexually assaulting an unconscious lady behind a dumpster. The case drew nationwide consideration and sparked outrage because of the lenient sentence Turner obtained: six months in county jail and three years of probation.
In the course of the trial, Turner’s mother and father, Dan and Carryl Turner, made a number of public statements that additional infected the general public’s anger. They expressed sympathy for his or her son and criticized the sufferer, arguing that she was partially answerable for the assault as a result of she had been ingesting. Their feedback had been extensively condemned as victim-blaming and insensitive.
The Turner mother and father’ conduct through the trial and within the aftermath has led to a lot dialogue concerning the function of privilege and entitlement within the legal justice system. Some have argued that the Turners’ wealth and social standing allowed them to downplay the seriousness of their son’s crime and to reduce the hurt he had triggered.
brock turner mother and father
Rich, privileged, and entitled.
- Sufferer-blaming.
- Insensitive feedback.
- Downplayed son’s crime.
- Minimized sufferer’s hurt.
- Lack of accountability.
- Perpetuation of rape tradition.
- Image of injustice.
- Catalyst for change.
- Reminder of privilege’s function in justice.
The Brock Turner mother and father’ conduct has sparked a nationwide dialog about sexual assault, victim-blaming, and the function of privilege within the legal justice system.
Sufferer-blaming.
Sufferer-blaming is a typical and dangerous response to sexual assault. It entails inserting the blame for the assault on the sufferer, somewhat than on the perpetrator. This could take many kinds, akin to suggesting that the sufferer was “asking for it” by dressing provocatively, or that they need to have been extra cautious to keep away from being assaulted.
Within the case of Brock Turner, his mother and father engaged in victim-blaming by suggesting that the sufferer was partially answerable for the assault as a result of she had been ingesting. This can be a traditional instance of victim-blaming, because it shifts the main focus away from the perpetrator’s actions and onto the sufferer’s conduct.
Sufferer-blaming is dangerous as a result of it retraumatizes the sufferer and makes it much less possible that they are going to come ahead and report the assault. It additionally sends the message that sexual assault is someway the sufferer’s fault, which may make it tougher for victims to heal and transfer on.
The Turner mother and father’ victim-blaming feedback had been notably egregious as a result of they had been made in a public discussion board, throughout their son’s trial. This gave their feedback a wider viewers and made them much more dangerous to the sufferer.
Sufferer-blaming isn’t acceptable. You will need to do not forget that sexual assault isn’t the sufferer’s fault. For those who or somebody has been sexually assaulted, there are assets obtainable to assist.
Insensitive feedback.
Along with their victim-blaming feedback, Brock Turner’s mother and father additionally made a variety of different insensitive and hurtful remarks.
-
They in contrast their son’s assault to “a foul night time out.”
This remark trivializes the seriousness of sexual assault and fails to acknowledge the lasting hurt that it will probably trigger.
-
They mentioned that their son “made a mistake.”
This assertion means that sexual assault is a minor offense, somewhat than a severe crime.
-
They expressed extra concern for his or her son’s future than for the sufferer’s well-being.
This can be a clear indication of the place their priorities lie.
-
They advised that the sufferer was someway answerable for the assault as a result of she was intoxicated.
This can be a traditional instance of victim-blaming.
The Turner mother and father’ insensitive feedback triggered additional ache and outrage for the sufferer and her supporters. In addition they demonstrated a whole lack of expertise concerning the seriousness of sexual assault and the affect it will probably have on victims.
